Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ...

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ...
Date: 2002-11-14 21:16:11
Message-ID: 3DD4129B.EC0716D9@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
<snip>
> > Personally I think this is a low-risk patch and so choice 2 is
> > appropriate.

If this is the only change, then 2 does seem like the best mix of
risk/progress.

:-)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

> Sorry, I was vague. I think we should apply and go to RC1 tomorrow.
> There will always be tweaks and fixes. If we expect it to be perfect,
> we will never make a final release. We are 2.5 months into beta, and
> if we don't want +3 months beta, we should get going.
>
> We have to start taking some _reasonable_ risks to move this forward.
> Until we make a final, we will not increase our test pool, and at this
> point we are all sort of staring at each other. Let's go!
<snip>

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-11-14 21:18:34 Re: Debian build prob
Previous Message Patrick Welche 2002-11-14 20:55:22 Debian build prob