Re: CTID: Anyway to lock it?

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Jim Hines <jhines(at)wdtv(dot)com>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CTID: Anyway to lock it?
Date: 2002-11-05 10:04:33
Message-ID: 3DC797B1.761EB5D2@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

Dave Page wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Hines [mailto:jhines(at)wdtv(dot)com]
> > Sent: 04 November 2002 20:06
> > To: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org; Dave Page
> > Subject: Re: [ODBC] CTID: Anyway to lock it?
> >
> > The folks at Chyron say they are not specifiing CTID and that
> > it must be
> > within the ODBC driver. Could this be the case? If so, what
> > setting would
> > control this?
>
> Hmm, yes - it appears to be in inner_process_tokens(QueryParse *qp,
> QueryBuild *qb) in convert.c. I don't know what options might affect
> that though I'm afraid - do you know Hiroshi?

The driver uses CTID and OID to implement updatable cursors.
Please turn off the *Updatable cursors* DSN option if you
don't like the behavior.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Samuele 2002-11-05 10:07:05 Increase inactivity timeout
Previous Message Tambet Matiisen 2002-11-05 09:50:41 updatable views and optimistic locking