[Fwd: Urgent request for a PostgreSQL contact from advocacy.postgresql.org]

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Diogo Biazus <diogo(at)ikono(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy Mailing List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: [Fwd: Urgent request for a PostgreSQL contact from advocacy.postgresql.org]
Date: 2002-11-04 23:29:40
Message-ID: 3DC702E4.F30A4694@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Hi Diogo,

Just received this through the Advocacy site request form.

Used Altavista's Babelfish to translate it, and it seems like Ricardo is
asking if we support databases greater than 100GB. Is this the correct
meaning of what he's asking?

:-)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Urgent request for a PostgreSQL contact from
advocacy.postgresql.org
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:20:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Advocacy Website <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: justin(at)postgresql(dot)org

Ricardo has requested to be contacted in regards to PostgreSQL.

Email address : linuxcracker(at)globo(dot)com

Preferred language : Portugues

The nature of the request : Cases de Empresas com bases maiores que 100g
em Postgresql\.

E se o Postgresql suporta essa quantidade de dados

Grato

Ricardo

The region of the requester :

The name of the requester's company :

The number of people in the requester's company : 5000

The urgency of the request is : 4

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2002-11-05 04:22:02 Re: Press release for 7.3
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2002-11-04 17:04:08 Press release for 7.3