| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: autocommit vs TRUNCATE et al |
| Date: | 2002-10-22 06:02:48 |
| Message-ID: | 3DB4EA08.2080204@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> In the meantime, to tell you the truth, the cleanest way to handle the
> dblink regression test would be to make it circularly connect to
> database "regression". I know this seems cheesy, but as long as the
> software under test doesn't know that it's a connection-to-self, seems
> like the test is perfectly good. And it's surely easier to manage that
> way.
OK, easy enough. Patch attached.
I also added "SET autocommit TO ''on'';" to the beginning of each dblink_exec
input statement because the "SET autocommit TO 'on';" at the top of the script
won't help for the connected database.
Joe
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| dblink-regress-fix2.1.patch | text/plain | 9.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-10-22 06:42:08 | Re: Flyer, Press Release |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-22 05:38:01 | Re: autocommit vs TRUNCATE et al |