Re: /contrib/retep to gborg

From: Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: /contrib/retep to gborg
Date: 2002-10-20 02:41:29
Message-ID: 3DB217D9.8050302@xythos.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

I don't object. In fact I have never even looked at this code before
now. I doubt anyone else on the jdbc list would mind either, but it
wouldn't hurt to ask.

--Barry

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>>Actually, it looks to me like they belong with the JDBC driver.
>>
>
>>It is java, but only tangentially related to the driver.
>
>
> I doubt that either of us are qualified to opine on that point.
> Perhaps you should be asking in pgsql-jdbc whether it's okay to remove
> contrib/retep. If no one there objects, then I won't complain.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-20 02:42:07 Re: DBD::PG - any works to be compatile with 7.3 ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-20 02:40:33 Re: /contrib/retep to gborg

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2002-10-20 03:02:37 Re: new String(byte[]) performance
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-20 02:40:33 Re: /contrib/retep to gborg