Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel
Date: 2002-09-26 03:21:43
Message-ID: 3D927D47.6060702@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Uh, I thought you were changing connection_timeout, which is libpq and
> not a GUC parameter

Yup, you're right -- I got myself confused. Sorry.

> not statement_timeout. Do we want sub-second
> timeout values? Not sure.
>

I found it surprising that the statement_timeout was not in units of seconds,
but that's only because I read the docs after I tried it instead of before. I
can't think of a reason to have sub-second values, but it's probably not worth
changing it at this point.

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-26 03:28:19 Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-26 03:15:12 Re: Insert Performance