From: | Wim <wdh(at)belbone(dot)be> |
---|---|
To: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Copying table to another database. |
Date: | 2002-09-17 14:39:35 |
Message-ID: | 3D873EA7.6020408@belbone.be |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Wim wrote:
>
>
>>>The next simple but dumb test, which I don't know if you have already tried, is
>>>to check that you can SELECT * FROM pg_* without error.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>"SELECT * FROM pg_*" gives:
>>ERROR: Relation "pg_" does not exist
>>
>>
>
>Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant the pg_* to represent all of the pg_ tables
>taken in turn. To get a list try:
>
>SELECT relname FROM pg_class WHERE relname like 'pg_%' AND relkind = 'r'
>
SELECT relname, relkind from pg_class;
works, but:
SELECT relname FROM pg_class WHERE relname like 'pg_%' AND relkind = 'r';
belbonedb_v2-# ;
server closed the connection unexpectedly
This probably means the server terminated abnormally
before or while processing the request.
The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
>I see in the meantime there's been more messages suggesting the hardware is at
>fault. I still wouldn't rule that out, especially if you haven't been able to
>properly test these things. Running a second box in parallel once you are
>up and will help show if this is the problem. However, in this regard I'd be
>more inclined to use a replacement system for production, you can extract your
>data alright and should be able to recreate the schema for earlier dumps, and
>to then test the Sparc machine thoroughly. Perhaps even calling Sun to handle
>or help with this.
>
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-09-17 14:39:54 | Re: Still big problems with pg_dump! |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-09-17 14:33:47 | Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump! |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-09-17 14:39:54 | Re: Still big problems with pg_dump! |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2002-09-17 14:33:47 | Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump! |