[OT]Physical sites handling large data

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [OT]Physical sites handling large data
Date: 2002-09-13 11:04:51
Message-ID: 3D8213AB.11155.9994FC7@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hi all,

One of my friends is evaluating postgres for large databases. This is a select
intensive application which is something similar to data-warehousing as far as
I can see.

The data is 150GB in flat files so would swell to 200GB+ with indexes.

Is anybody running that kind of site? Any url? Any performance numbers/tuning
tips for random selects?

I would hate to put mysql there but we are evaluating that too. I would hate if
postgres loses this to mysql because I didn't know few things about postgres.

Secondly would it make a difference if I host that database on say, an HP-UX
box? From some tests I have done for my job, single CPU HP-UX box trounces 4
way xeon box. Any suggestions in this directions?

TIA..

Bye
Shridhar

--
Quality Control, n.: The process of testing one out of every 1,000 units coming
off a production line to make sure that at least one out of 100 works.

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephane Bortzmeyer 2002-09-13 12:06:01 Re: An opportunity to prove PostgreSQL and our requirement of Case Study info [EUreg #11]
Previous Message Deepa 2002-09-13 10:50:56 database connectivty problem!

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-09-13 11:27:17 Re: Multicolumn foreign keys need useless unique indices?
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2002-09-13 10:43:33 Re: