Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about
Date: 2002-08-30 20:18:30
Message-ID: 3D6FD316.7000104@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>>Here is a patch with the above mentioned fix. It also has an addition to
>>rangefuncs.sql and rangefuncs.out to ensure a C language table function
>>gets tested.
>
> Good idea. Will apply.

BTW, Neil, do you have a sample plpgsql table function that can be
included in the rangefuncs regression test?

Thanks,

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tyler Mitchell 2002-08-30 20:47:00 Running postgres on a read-only file system
Previous Message Dave Page 2002-08-30 20:02:51 Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-30 20:54:30 [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] Accessing original TupleDesc from SRF]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-30 19:38:29 Re: SRF memory mgmt patch (was [HACKERS] Concern about