Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka
Date: 2002-08-04 06:53:46
Message-ID: 3D4CCF7A.3020506@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am sorry but I am unable to apply this patch because of the DROP
> COLUMN patch that was applied since you submitted this.
>
> It had rejections in gram.y and parse_relation.c, but those were easy to
> fix. The big problem is pg_proc.c, where the code changes can not be
> merged.
>
> I am attaching the rejected part of the patch. If you can send me a
> fixed version of just that change, I can commit the rest.
>

OK. Here is a patch against current cvs for just pg_proc.c. This
includes all the changes for that file (i.e. not just the one rejected
hunk).

Thanks,

Joe

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_proc.c.2002.08.03.1.patch text/plain 8.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-04 06:58:59 Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-08-04 06:50:08 Re: Table inheritance versus views

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-04 19:48:10 Re: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-04 05:11:44 Re: Updated CHECK failed message patch