Re: Trimming the Fat: Getting code via CVSup ...

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Trimming the Fat: Getting code via CVSup ...
Date: 2002-08-01 17:21:34
Message-ID: 3D496E1E.D7C1CA31@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Try now ... the download isn't going to work right though, as CVSup
> doesn't honor the modules file in CVSROOT which defines how 'pgsql' is
> *supposed* to work ... I'm going to work on this later tonight and see if
> I can find something in the docs that will allow it to work properly, but
> right now, other then gettin gat the sub-modules themselves, CVSup is
> broken ... anon-cvs will fair you better ...

Goodness no! CVSup will work just fine, you just need to make sure that
the modules "package" is available to be downloaded too. So the
client-side CVSup configuration file will change a bit, but nothing else
needs to worry.

This should not stay broken for more than a few hours, otherwise we
should revert the changes until we've worked out more details.

It may be that the server-side CVSup can be configured to include both
packages, but I would guess not since CVS organizes modules above (or
beside) all packages, rather than underneath any of them.

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-01 17:23:17 Re: Open 7.3 items
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2002-08-01 17:19:07 Re: Rules and Views