From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Agent155 Support <matt(at)planetnet(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: workaround for lack of REPLACE() function |
Date: | 2002-07-11 17:38:17 |
Message-ID: | 3D2DC289.889FBB90@fourpalms.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
...
> I think Thomas did just recently commit the SQL99 OVERLAY function, but
> similar to Tom's comment, I don't like the way SQL99 defines it. I've
> written a replace() C function (along with a couple of other string
> manipulation functions) for my own use. If you'd like a copy let me know
> and I'll gladly send it to you.
OK, what don't you like about it? If you can define some functionality
that we *should* have, then it is likely to go into the main distro.
Either as an extension to existing functions or as a separate function.
"Style" counts for not-much, but "can't do it with what we have" counts
for a lot.
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2002-07-11 17:40:35 | Re: Type TEXT |
Previous Message | chris.gamble | 2002-07-11 17:31:34 | Case Sensitivity and Indexes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro | 2002-07-11 17:40:46 | Re: [HACKERS] please help on query |
Previous Message | Manfred Koizar | 2002-07-11 16:47:03 | Re: [HACKERS] please help on query |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-07-11 18:34:04 | Re: workaround for lack of REPLACE() function |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-07-11 16:44:34 | Re: workaround for lack of REPLACE() function |