Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Reduce heap tuple header size

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reduce heap tuple header size
Date: 2002-06-21 14:03:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Do we have any hard numbers on that? Is it just access to the header
> > fields, or do we loose the offset cacheability of all fixed size fields
> > at the beginning of a row? In the latter case count me into the
> > slowness-believer camp.
> I don't believe the patch would have made the header variable size,
> only changed what the fixed size is.  The slowdown I was worried about
> was just a matter of a couple extra tests and branches in the tqual.c
> routines; which would be negligible if they weren't such hotspots.

Did someone run at least pgbench with/without that patch applied?



# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2002-06-21 14:07:08
Subject: Re: Our archive searching stinks
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 2002-06-21 14:02:27
Subject: Re: Idea for the statistics collector

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-06-21 14:08:26
Subject: Re: contrib/DBMirror
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-06-21 14:02:51
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_dumpall should permit quiet operation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group