Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers)

Tom Lane wrote:
> I am still concerned about whether ExecFunctionReScan works correctly;
> if not, the problems would show up in join and subquery situations.
> I think the parser and planner stages are in pretty good shape now,
> though. (At least as far as the basic functionality goes. Having
> a smarter materialization policy will take work in the planner.)
>
Here's a small patch to ExecFunctionReScan. It was clearing
scanstate->csstate.cstate.cs_ResultTupleSlot
when I think it should have been clearing
scanstate->csstate.css_ScanTupleSlot

although there is no discernable (at least to me) difference either way.

Joe