Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Loftis <mloftis(at)wgops(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
Date: 2002-04-25 02:54:36
Message-ID: 3CC76FEC.20D6CE0A@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Loftis wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >Hiroshi, we need a psql solution too. People are feeding query files
> >into psql all the time and we should have an appropriate behavior for
> >them.
> >
> >I now understand your point that from a ODBC perspective, you may not
> >want SETs rolled back and you would rather ODBC handle what to do with
> >SETs. Not sure I like pushing that job off to the application
> >programmer, but I think I see your point.
> >
>
> Ahhh Hiroshi is talkign formt he aspect of ODBC? Well, thats an ODBC
> issue, should be handled by the ODBC driver.

No.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-04-25 02:55:35 Re: unknownin/out patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-25 02:53:55 Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction