Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Date: 2002-04-15 10:21:33
Message-ID: 3CBAA9AD.6D80C978@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > There are a fair number of things in the TODO list that you put there
> > because you liked 'em, but that doesn't mean everyone else agrees.
> > I certainly will not accept "once it's on the TODO list it cannot be
> > questioned"...
>
> I put it there because I didn't think there was any question.

Honetsly I don't understand what TODO means.
Can a developer solve the TODOs any way he likes ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-04-15 11:06:55 Re: Importing Large Amounts of Data
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2002-04-15 09:42:10 Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-04-15 12:25:05 YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2002-04-15 09:42:10 Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts