Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information]

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information]
Date: 2002-04-10 16:55:34
Message-ID: 3CB46E85.D18BDB9@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 16:32, Justin Clift wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > This is Prof. Bayer's response to the question "is it alright to use
> > UB-Tree's in Open Source projects?".
>
> Have you found out _what_ exaclty is patented ?
>
> Is it just his concrete implementation of "UB-Tree" or something
> broader, like using one multi-dimensional index instead of multiple
> one-dimensional ones ?

Is there any way of finding out instead of asking him directly? Maybe
the patent places have online info?

Professor Bayer isn't being overly informative.

Anyone know?

:-)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

> ---------------------
> Hannu

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Harding 2002-04-10 17:08:48 Re: PGAdmin
Previous Message Jillian Carroll 2002-04-10 16:53:58 Re: PGAdmin

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-10 16:59:26 Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2002-04-10 16:31:05 Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information]