Re: Fw: Fw: bad performance on irix

Does that mean I should redo patch for 7.3 as is, or you guys want it to
go farther this time? The last version had compromises intended to make
changes minimal...

Also, does anyone from Darwin or BeOS camp care? You guys should not be
working through emulation of SysV ugliness. If someone is listening, we
could come up with a version suitable for you too...

-- igor

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> Just remember that patches for 7.3 are being accepted at this very moment...
>
> Chris
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Igor Kovalenko
> > Sent: Friday, 22 March 2002 1:31 AM
> > To: Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
> > Cc: bruc(at)acm(dot)org; tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: [HACKERS] bad performance on irix
> >
> >
> > No, I've been told it is not gonna be considered for 7.2x and I shall
> > wait till 7.3.
> >
> > Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro wrote:
> > >
> > > > Makes me wonder... perhaps now someone will be convinced to
> > take a look
> > > > at the POSIX IPC patch. On some platforms (not on Linux I am afraid)
> > > > POSIX mutexes might be quite a bit faster than SYSV semaphores.
> > > >
> > > Is there any current patch?
> > > Regards
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> >