Re: Why overlaps is not working

From: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Andrus <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why overlaps is not working
Date: 2006-11-27 23:19:02
Message-ID: 3C80B72B-F961-48DF-B881-81BC18E810AF@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Nov 23, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
>> If my database contains dates greater than DATE '9999-12-31' then
>> this
>> check fails.
>>
>> This is why I'm searching for a real MAX_DATE value in Postgres.
>>
>> It would be nice if there will be MAX_DATE constant in Postgres or
>> some one
>> row system table contains MAX_DATE value.
>
> through expermentation I came up with:
>
> logs=# select '5874897-12-31'::date;
> date
> ---------------
> 5874897-12-31
> (1 row)
>
> logs=# select '5874898-12-31'::date;
> ERROR: date out of range: "5874898-12-31"

Keep in mind that that number could change depending on if you're
using integer or floating point timestamps.

I know that numeric supports +/- infinity; I don't remember off-hand
if timestamps have that as well.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2006-11-27 23:24:31 Re: IN clause
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2006-11-27 23:16:09 Re: A generic trigger to log chanes on database tables