Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ??

Heh Heh Heh

Well, if we can get a *really good operating version of PostgreSQL in
Cygwin* happening on XP, why not?

;-)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

Colin Faber wrote:
>
> Personally, I have to agree with Tom,
>
> Silly versioning like that is for marketing teams and microsoft ;-)
>
> <sarcasm>How about the next version be released as PostgreSQL
> XP</sarcasm>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > > Doesn't this seem like postgresql 8.0, rather than 7.3?
> >
> > It took us five years to go from 6.0 to 7.0 ... I don't think we
> > need talk about 8.0 for awhile yet.
> >
> > I'm not in favor of arbitrary "release number inflation". A release
> > is a release, whatever you call it.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
> --
> Colin Faber
> (303) 859-1491
> fpsn.net, Inc.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi