Re: contrib/pg_filedump - PostgreSQL File Dump Utility

From: Patrick Macdonald <patrickm(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, darcy(at)druid(dot)net
Subject: Re: contrib/pg_filedump - PostgreSQL File Dump Utility
Date: 2002-02-07 14:59:17
Message-ID: 3C629645.41C5BDF4@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Hi All,

Seems that I opened up a interesting can of worms with my little
submission. I guess sooner or later it was going to happen.

Anyway... as I mentioned before, the utility is part of the RHDB
Tools/Utility component. Red Hat's preferred license is GPL
and as such, the utility is licensed under GPL as it is not part
of PostgreSQL proper. I found the utility handy while looking at
data problems and thought other developers would too.

When looking at the contrib directory, I noted that there where
GPL contributions and I couldn't find a disclaimer that all
contributions had to be BSD. So, I sent it in for consideration.

For what it's worth, I think the best route to take is as follows:

. Reject/withdraw my contrib request (I will make it available to
the community at http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb)

. Have the Steering Committee decide whether all contrib
packages have to adhere to the BSD license.
. If they do, ask the contributors to re-license under BSD.
For those that refuse, remove them from the contrib directory.
. If contrib doesn't require BSD, I'll resubmit.

. Display the decision on the contrib section of the website
so we don't have to spend time spinning on this issue again.

Cheers,
Patrick

Justin Clift wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Do you mind re-licensing this with the BSD license for us?
>
> :-)
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >
> > > I do have concerns about including these six contrib modules in our
> > > distribution, however. It could be argued that the terms of the GPL
> > > forbid that.
> >
> > That is one thing. Another concern is that it confuses the general
> > public. People have certain expectations when it comes to PostgreSQL
> > code, and if every little subdirectory has its own license it just becomes
> > annoying.
> >
> > --
> > Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
> --
> "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
> who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
> first group; there was less competition there."
> - Indira Gandhi
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
Patrick

Patrick Macdonald
Red Hat Canada

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-02-07 18:40:34 Re: Automatic transactions in psql
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-07 06:02:07 Re: contrib/pg_filedump - PostgreSQL File Dump Utility