Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server

From: Haroldo Stenger <hstenger(at)adinet(dot)com(dot)uy>
To: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Date: 2002-02-06 20:59:32
Message-ID: 3C619934.BBC0B9CD@adinet.com.uy
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Doug McNaught wrote:
> The one place where it could be a clear win would be in splitting
> single very large queries over multiple CPUs. This would probably
> require an even larger redesign of the whole system than moving to a
> query-per-thread rather than per-process model. I think "real"
> multi-master replication and clustering is a better goal in the short
> term...

Agreed.

Though, starting to think & code thread safe would be nice too.

Regards,
Haroldo.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mkscott 2002-02-06 21:00:01 Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-02-06 20:47:45 JOIN between three *simple* tables ...