| From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurette Cisneros <laurette(at)nextbus(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: best way to use bitvarying? |
| Date: | 2002-01-08 17:49:47 |
| Message-ID: | 3C3B313B.1000808@xythos.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Laurette,
bytea is supported in 7.2, and the 7.2 drivers will work against either
a 7.1 or 7.2 database. You can download the latest 7.2 drivers from
jdbc.postgresql.org.
thanks,
--Barry
Laurette Cisneros wrote:
> Last I was hearing (see http://lab.applinet.nl/postgresql-jdbc/#Lob) "bytea
> is currently unsupported in the jdbc interface". Is this not true for 7.2?
> Is there a suggested way of using this with jdbc?
>
> Thanks for the help,
>
> L.
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>>Laurette Cisneros <laurette(at)nextbus(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>>We would like to store *small* images into bitvarying fields.
>>>
>>Wouldn't BYTEA be a better choice? Do you really want to treat the data
>>a bit at a time, rather than a byte at a time?
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Barry Lind | 2002-01-08 18:19:27 | Re: Failure in timestamptz of JDBC of 7.2b4 |
| Previous Message | Holger Krug | 2002-01-08 15:11:24 | Re: JDBC: why is PGobject class instead of interface? |