| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item |
| Date: | 2002-01-08 03:47:20 |
| Message-ID: | 3C3A6BC8.591D12@fourpalms.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > > * Make it easier to create a database owned by someone who can't createdb,
> > > perhaps CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH USER = "user"
> > CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH OWNER = "user"
> A much better idea. There is no conflict in using OWNER here.
Does this have the multiple "WITH xxx" clauses which were discussed
earlier? That is a nonstarter for syntax. There are other places in the
grammar having "with clauses" and multiple arguments or subclauses, and
having the shift/reduce issues resolved...
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-01-08 03:48:04 | Re: ecpg compile error on AIX |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2002-01-08 02:20:30 | Re: Problem with view and fetch_fields |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-01-08 03:58:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-07 18:56:45 | Re: [HACKERS] pgcryto strangeness... |