| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Igor Kovalenko <Igor(dot)Kovalenko(at)motorola(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Support for QNX6, POSIX IPC and PTHREAD-style locking |
| Date: | 2001-11-28 03:07:30 |
| Message-ID: | 3C0454F2.41B0780F@fourpalms.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> <bow><bow><bow>
> At this point, I suggest core developers will ask me when/if they feel like
> they want another submission from me.
> <bow><bow><bow>
> Merry X-mas & happy new year everyone.
> <yield><yield><yield>
:))
I've followed this thread mostly after the fact, after perhaps
contributing to Igor's hopes that this might get into 7.2. I think that
pushing this off to 7.3 (or *perhaps* 7.2.1 for QNX6-only changes) is
the Right Thing.
We are *always* interested in patches, but actually applying them during
final betas is not a good thing in general. Participating during the
development cycle is welcome, and the Posix semaphores are likely to
pique several people's interest. Jump in again a few weeks after 7.2 is
released.
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-11-28 03:40:05 | Re: fixes for date_part micro/millisecond precision |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2001-11-28 02:17:49 | Re: Support for QNX6, POSIX IPC and PTHREAD-style locking |