Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches

From: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches
Date: 2001-10-17 21:24:14
Message-ID: 3BCDF6FE.3090009@selectacast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Don't you need execute cvs commands to add new files? I guess I don't know.

Barry Lind wrote:

> Anyone can do that by submitting a patch. I don't see anything special
> that needs to be done.
>
> --Barry
>
> Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
>> Right. And a maintainer needs to make a jdbc3 direcotry and modifiy
>> the ant files to use it when it detects a jdk of 1.4+
>>
>>
>> Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>>> What do you see wrong with the build process?
>>>
>>> Ant is used to build the driver!
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Joseph Shraibman
>>> Sent: October 16, 2001 5:45 PM
>>> To: Rene Pijlman
>>> Cc: Mark Lillywhite (pg-jdbc); pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>> Subject: Re: [JDBC] J2SE 1.4 and other patches
>>>
>>>
>>> I think what most needs to be done is for someone to update the build
>>> process, so people who want to hack code will have somewhere to start
>>> from.
>>>
>>> Rene Pijlman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 13 Oct 2001 11:16:07 +1000, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I was just wondering if anyone is working on support for JDK1.4 for
>>>>> the postgresql drivers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Not AFAIK.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> It appears that there are some new methods defined
>>>>> in a few interfaces that need to be implemented (presumably to just
>>>>> throw the "unimplemented" exception?).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Do you mean JDBC 3.0 methods? What methods precisely? Are they
>>>> implementable?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Also, I have a patch for DatabaseMetaData to fix a bug in the metadata
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>> returned for BigDecimals. I have already tried to submit this patch
>>>>> 2 or 3 times (to peter(at)retep) but never heard back. It's only about
>>>>> 4 LOC but it makes introspecting the database much better.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this the place to post a patch, and if I do, am I likely to get
>>>>> a response?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You can send patches to the pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org list,
>>>> preferably with a CC to this list. Yes, you will get a response.
>>>> Usually, a patch is applied within a week (if the patch is good, of
>>>> course).
>>>>
>>>> If a patch to the JDBC driver needs discussion first, that should be
>>>> on this list.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------(end of
>>>> broadcast)---------------------------
>>>> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

--
Joseph Shraibman
jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph Shraibman 2001-10-17 21:35:42 Re: JDBC 2 ResultSet and cursors
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-10-17 20:35:07 Re: Ant configuration