| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurette Cisneros <laurette(at)nextbus(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |
| Date: | 2001-10-04 18:00:22 |
| Message-ID: | 3BBCA3B6.DE5EA717@fourpalms.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Laurette Cisneros wrote:
>
> Could I get some more specific information on how this is fixed. Keep in mind that using tochar() is not an option for us in that we ned to use COPY to/from the client.
I'm finishing up implementing SQL99-style precision features in
timestamp et al, so there will no longer be an arbitrary rounding of
time to 2 decimal places when values are output. There will of course be
*other* issues for you to worry about, since the default precision
specified by SQL99 is zero decimal places...
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-10-04 18:03:13 | Unhappiness with forced precision conversion for timestamp |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-10-04 17:57:59 | Re: pgsql/src/backend parser/parse_coerce.c utils/ ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heitzso | 2001-10-04 18:29:03 | Re: JDBC 2.0 |
| Previous Message | Laurette Cisneros | 2001-10-04 17:46:10 | Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |