Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes
Date: 2001-10-01 18:54:52
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
> <li><a href="">SGML docs
> updated every half-hour</a>

Ya know, if I'm required to wait 12 hours for *any* source code build to
be available to my CVSup'd repository, why should we slap in a bunch of
short circuits for the docs? And if this is a valuable thing to do, why
short circuit the docs building procedure I've already got on the main
machines by pointing the web site off to some other machine?

fwiw, one docs building procedure, either ~thomas's, or ~petere's new
one, or ~bruce's should be sufficient imho.

Since we all seem to be heading off in different directions, we should
talk about why that is necessary and try to get headed somewhere
productively imho.

                     - Thomas

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-10-01 18:55:43
Subject: Re: CVS changes
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-10-01 18:46:03
Subject: Re: CVS changes

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-10-01 18:55:25
Subject: Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-10-01 18:54:36
Subject: Re: Preparation for Beta

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group