| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal |
| Date: | 2001-09-27 02:45:06 |
| Message-ID: | 3BB292B2.975E3CD7@fourpalms.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> ... Thomas still has his date/time stuff
> to finish off, now that CVSup is fixed ...
I'm now getting clean runs through the regression tests on a freshly
merged cvs tree. I'd like to look at it a little more to adjust
pg_proc.h attributes before I commit the changes.
There was a bit of a hiccup when merging since there was some bytea
stuff added to the catalogs over the last couple of weeks. Could folks
hold off on claiming new OIDs until I get this stuff committed? TIA
I expect to be able to merge this stuff by Friday at the latest, more
likely tomorrow.
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Pilosov | 2001-09-27 02:58:41 | Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal |
| Previous Message | Vic Cekvneich | 2001-09-27 02:23:26 | [Fwd: Re: JDBC update wont, plz help.] |