| From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rene Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why JDBC 1? |
| Date: | 2001-09-04 17:18:26 |
| Message-ID: | 3B950CE2.5050506@xythos.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
One reason is that jdbc2 goes along with Java2. Thus in the jdbc2 tree
we are allowed to use new methods introduced in jdk1.2. Whereas in the
jdbc1 tree we are limited to methods available in jdk1.1.
thanks,
--Barry
Rene Pijlman wrote:
> Perhaps this is a silly question, but why do we have separate
> JDBC 1 and 2 drivers?
>
> Isn't the JDBC 2 driver also an implementation of JDBC 1?
>
> Regards,
> René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-09-04 17:20:41 | Re: Read transactions don't work on 7.0.x db's 2nd patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-09-04 17:15:57 | Re: Read transactions don't work on 7.0.x db's Disregard my other |