Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...

I am assuming that this would be a new function in the server.
Therefore this wouldn't be jdbc specific and would be available to all
client interfaces. I don't see what this really has to do with JDBC.

thanks,
--Barry

Ned Wolpert wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Ok, so you're not opposed to the idea then, just the syntax. Does anyone
> oppose having this concept in the JDBC driver? And what syntax is acceptable?
> Could we just do
> 'select getInsertedOID()'
> which would break people who have functions called getInsertedOID() of course...
>
>
>
> On 21-Aug-2001 Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>>What about the 'select @@last_oid' to make the getInsertedOID() call
>>>available even when the driver is wrapped by a pooling manager?
>>>
>>>How do people feel about this?
>>>
>>Yech. At least, not with *that* syntax. @@ is a valid operator name
>>in Postgres.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>
>>http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>>
>
>
> Virtually,
> Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
>
> D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE7gv5yiysnOdCML0URAq7qAJkBRhAcE9wctn7bUAv7UMwN3n9+nwCeJR4V
> ymYTw8l3f9WU4V5idFsibAE=
> =UQ2M
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>