Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal

From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal
Date: 2001-08-07 15:17:55
Message-ID: 3B7006A3.EDC8594F@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

If we have WITH NOOID, why not having a WITH OID32 and WITH OID64 (or
something of a sort)
as well (being OID32 the default and OID an alias to it)?
The last would not be available on some systems
(who will use a system that does not support long long as a database
server anyway?)

The wire protocol will always handle the (tableoid) long form,
references will always store
the long form... The OID32 would exist only to allow people to save
space in tables that need
OIDs but not the 64 bit version.

--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-07 15:22:23 Re: Proposal: OID wraparound: summary and proposal
Previous Message Matthew Kirkwood 2001-08-07 14:53:27 Re: Notes about int8 sequences