Re: AW: Possible feature?

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "'Mike Mascari'" <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: Possible feature?
Date: 2001-07-11 12:58:59
Message-ID: 3B4C4D93.AA4F8936@tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>
> On the other hand, what hinders you from using a "speaking" name for the
> constraint ?
>
> postgres=# create table aa (id int, constraint "for Social Security number" unique (id));
> NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/UNIQUE will create implicit index 'for Social Security number' for table 'aa'
> CREATE
> postgres=# insert into aa values (1);
> INSERT 23741 1
> postgres=# insert into aa values (1);
> ERROR: Cannot insert a duplicate key into unique index for Social Security number

I might want the message to be in some other language ...

I might even want the language to depend on CURRENT_USER.

-------------
Hannu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Grant 2001-07-11 13:06:57 JDBC and stored procedures
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2001-07-11 12:57:39 Re: 2 gig file size limit