Re: RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]

I like that idea. Best of both worlds. I will redo my patch to do that
and resubmit.

thanks,
--Barry

Dave Cramer wrote:

> Bruce, Barry,
>
> How about checking for the existence of the date object in the
> constructor? This would mean that it would only be created once per
> thread.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: June 25, 2001 2:50 PM
> To: Barry Lind
> Cc: Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net; 'PostgreSQL jdbc list'
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]
>
>
>>Bruce,
>>
>>I don't think you need to back out Dave's patch. It works fine as it
>>is. I just think it can be improved upon.
>>
>
> OK, you just let me know.
>
>