Re: Followup to IRIX6.5 installation of PG 7.1.1

From: "G(dot) Anthony Reina" <reina(at)nsi(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Followup to IRIX6.5 installation of PG 7.1.1
Date: 2001-05-16 21:27:49
Message-ID: 3B02F0D5.58EC1B87@nsi.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> <string.h> is included in every Postgres source file (via c.h).
>

Yep. That's what I expected.

SGI technical support seems to think that the problem is with the POSIX flag.

" Have you defined any POSIX variables, such as -D_POSIX_SOURCE
or included pthread.h? When you enable POSIX you will incur a lot of
undefined smbols that are not POSIX compliant. You can check the symbols

in the POSIX standards. "

I can't say that I understand this at all, but I believe she is saying that
the -D_POSIX_SOURCE flag has caused some function declarations to be hidden
from the compiler (?).

In any case, since I have a working copy of 7.1.1 for IRIX, I'll leave all of
it alone for now as it has gone past my comprehension. SGI has a freeware site
with PostgreSQL 7.0.3. I'm sure that they'll figure this out when they try to
build 7.1.1 for the site.

-Tony

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-16 22:32:45 Re: Upgrade issue (again).
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-05-16 20:50:42 Upgrade issue (again).