Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: RE: ODBC and Access 2000

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk>, Chris Gray <cpgray(at)library(dot)uwaterloo(dot)ca>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RE: ODBC and Access 2000
Date: 2001-05-10 23:13:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-odbc
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> >       Is xmin a standard for RowVersioning?
> Not that I know of --- I had always thought it was a Postgres-ism,
> which is why I'm surprised that Access depends on it.

???? Of cource Access could know that xmin is a field for
row versioning by sending inquiries to psqlodbc driver.

Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Matthew DormerDate: 2001-05-10 23:59:22
Subject: RE: Writing Large Objects to Postgresql via ODBC using VB
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-05-10 20:59:08
Subject: Re: RE: ODBC and Access 2000

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group