| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk>, Chris Gray <cpgray(at)library(dot)uwaterloo(dot)ca>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RE: ODBC and Access 2000 |
| Date: | 2001-05-10 23:13:45 |
| Message-ID: | 3AFB20A9.8CEE7C89@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall(at)westcountrypublications(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > Is xmin a standard for RowVersioning?
>
> Not that I know of --- I had always thought it was a Postgres-ism,
> which is why I'm surprised that Access depends on it.
>
???? Of cource Access could know that xmin is a field for
row versioning by sending inquiries to psqlodbc driver.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew Dormer | 2001-05-10 23:59:22 | RE: Writing Large Objects to Postgresql via ODBC using VB |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-10 20:59:08 | Re: RE: ODBC and Access 2000 |