| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, psql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Call for platforms |
| Date: | 2001-04-13 13:25:45 |
| Message-ID: | 3AD6FE59.2A002747@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Did we decide that "most NetBSD/i386 users have fpus" in which case Marko's
> patch should be applied?
I'm unclear on what y'all mean by "i386 + fpu", especially since NetBSD
seems to insist on calling every Intel processor a "i386". In this case,
are you suggesting that this patch covers all NetBSD installations on
every Intel processor from i386 + fpu forward to i486, i586, etc etc? Or
is this specifically for the i386 with the 80387 coprocessor which is
how any reasonable person would interpret "i386+fpu"? ;)
- Thomas
> > Index: src/test/regress/resultmap
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/pgsql/src/test/regress/resultmap,v
> > retrieving revision 1.45
> > diff -u -r1.45 resultmap
> > --- src/test/regress/resultmap 2001/03/22 15:13:18 1.45
> > +++ src/test/regress/resultmap 2001/03/22 17:29:49
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > geometry/.*-openbsd=geometry-positive-zeros-bsd
> > geometry/.*-irix6=geometry-irix
> > geometry/.*-netbsd=geometry-positive-zeros
> > +geometry/i.86-.*-netbsdelf1.5=geometry-positive-zeros-bsd
> > geometry/.*-sysv5uw7.*:cc=geometry-uw7-cc
> > geometry/.*-sysv5uw7.*:gcc=geometry-uw7-gcc
> > geometry/alpha.*-dec-osf=geometry-alpha-precision
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-13 15:26:39 | Re: NUMERIC type efficiency problem |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-04-13 11:32:16 | Dump/restore of views containing select distinct fails |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jason Tishler | 2001-04-13 13:53:53 | Re: best Cygwin release/snapshot for Postgresql |
| Previous Message | Patrick Welche | 2001-04-12 16:15:52 | Re: Call for platforms |