Re: SELECT performance drop v 6.5 -> 7.0.3

From: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
To: "Creager, Robert S" <CreagRS(at)LOUISVILLE(dot)STORTEK(dot)COM>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SELECT performance drop v 6.5 -> 7.0.3
Date: 2001-03-08 03:56:40
Message-ID: 3AA702F8.1EA531DF@selectacast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Creager, Robert S" wrote:
>
> I've a question. I have often seen the 'trick' of dropping an index,
> importing large amounts of data, then re-creating the index to speed the
> import. The obvious problem with this is during the time from index drop to
> the index finishing re-creation, a large db is going to be essentially
> worthless to queries which use those indexes. I know nothing about the
> backend and how it does 'stuff', so I may be asking something absurd here.
> Why, when using transactions, are indexes updated on every insert? It seems
> logical (to someone who doesn't know better), that the indexes could be
> updated on the COMMIT.
>
> Please don't hurt me too bad...
> Rob
>

I imagine because the transaction might do a select on data it just
inserted/updated.

--
Joseph Shraibman
jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff 2001-03-08 04:02:10 How to check if a database exists
Previous Message Thomas Nagy 2001-03-08 01:17:03 Paradox, dbf and PostgreSQL ?