From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Fixes to index pages |
Date: | 2001-02-22 01:01:49 |
Message-ID: | 3A9464FD.BCCEF035@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Tom, here are the changes I was thinking about to clean up a few areas
> > > in index pages tables. I will hold the patch until 7.2.
> >
> > What happened to our discussion about keeping t_info bit 13 unused??
>
> I wasn't going to reserve it in the patch. I figured I would make all
> the items/flags match, and if someone wants to reserve it, it is easy to
> do in one place. I imagine 7.2 is going to be dump/reload anyway so the
> decision can be made during development cycle. I basically didn't want
> to leave a bit gap and leave it unnamed because it could cause
> confusion.
>
You have added the following TODO recently.
* Add deleted bit to index tuples to reduce heap access
Where would you have the deleted bit in IndexTupleData ?
Regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-22 01:05:19 | Re: Re: Fixes to index pages |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-02-22 00:31:04 | Re: Fixes to index pages |