|From:||Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>|
|To:||Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|Cc:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Re: Fixes to index pages|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Tom, here are the changes I was thinking about to clean up a few areas
> > > in index pages tables. I will hold the patch until 7.2.
> > What happened to our discussion about keeping t_info bit 13 unused??
> I wasn't going to reserve it in the patch. I figured I would make all
> the items/flags match, and if someone wants to reserve it, it is easy to
> do in one place. I imagine 7.2 is going to be dump/reload anyway so the
> decision can be made during development cycle. I basically didn't want
> to leave a bit gap and leave it unnamed because it could cause
You have added the following TODO recently.
* Add deleted bit to index tuples to reduce heap access
Where would you have the deleted bit in IndexTupleData ?
|Next Message||Bruce Momjian||2001-02-22 01:05:19||Re: Re: Fixes to index pages|
|Previous Message||Bruce Momjian||2001-02-22 00:31:04||Re: Fixes to index pages|