Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL odbc list <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
Date: 2001-02-12 01:07:02
Message-ID: 3A873736.DD4571CE@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > > I can put it back. You want it back?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > > ISTM discussion is needed before the change.
> >
> > I'm with Bruce on this (sorry Hiroshi :-)):
> >
> > 1) Surely if anyone is still using 6.3 or 6.2 they will probably not be
> > wanting to keep their ODBC driver cutting edge whilst using such an old
> > backend.
>
> I think Hiroshi's complaint was that it should be discussed more.
> Seems we have discussed it, and most agree on the removal.
>

Hmm I think you are not walking a proper 'discussion first'
process in the first place. You committed the removal 7 hours
after you had posted the first mail of this thread.
Is it sufficient ?

Regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-02-12 01:30:04 Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-02-12 00:59:16 Re: [ODBC] RE: [PATCHES] Fix for ODBC close