Re: Is Oracle really so much faster

From: Alvar Freude <alvar(dot)freude(at)merz-akademie(dot)de>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is Oracle really so much faster
Date: 2001-02-01 22:51:34
Message-ID: 3A79E876.71CA93D2@merz-akademie.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

> > try to make the commit every 500 or 1000 inserts. It seems to me, that
> > PG slow down if there are lots of MBs waiting for commit ...
>
> MB == Memory Buffers?
> If so then it shouldn't be the case for 7.0.X with Tom' work in bufmgr area.

Megabytes :-)

tested in 7.1

The inserts slow down if there are too much not-committed inserts
pending. But, I'm only sure about the time for the insert statement
itself, and not the complete time -- perhaps a final commit is faster
then the sum of a lot of commits in between.

At my test, I used two insert per object, and each object needed about
35 milliseconds (on P2/350 MHz) at each table size. If i inserted ~15000
obejcts in one transaction, the insertion time for each request slows
down to ~200 milliseconds at the end.

So, I guess this has to be tested in detail again ;)

Ciao
Alvar

--
Alvar C.H. Freude | alvar(dot)freude(at)merz-akademie(dot)de

Demo: http://www.online-demonstration.org/ | Mach mit!
Blast-DE: http://www.assoziations-blaster.de/ | Blast-Dich-Fit
Blast-EN: http://www.a-blast.org/ | Blast/english

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brice Ruth 2001-02-01 22:57:44 SQL Join - MySQL/PostgreSQL difference?
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2001-02-01 22:33:20 RE: Is Oracle really so much faster