| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) |
| Date: | 2001-01-22 22:10:19 |
| Message-ID: | 3A6CAFCB.DA142A1F@tm.ee |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> sounds like something that should be handled at the application level
> though ... at least the concept of 'access to other db manufacturers' ...
> no?
If and when we will get functions that can return rowsets (IIRC Oracle's
RETURN AND CONTINUE)the simplest case can be easily implemented by
having
a user-defined method that just does the query for the whole table (or
for rows where "field in (x,y,z)"
Then putting this in a view and then using it as a table should also
be quite simple (or at least possible ;).
Only after that should we start optimizing ...
--------------
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Mount | 2001-01-22 22:19:00 | Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-22 22:03:59 | Re: FW: Postgresql on win32 |