Re: MS Access vs IS NULL (was Re: [BUGS] Bug in SQL functions that use a NULL parameter directly)

From: Emmanuel Charpentier <charpent(at)bacbuc(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MS Access vs IS NULL (was Re: [BUGS] Bug in SQL functions that use a NULL parameter directly)
Date: 2001-01-15 06:55:35
Message-ID: 3A629EE7.E89EE605@bacbuc.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:
> > I don't have Office 2000, but I can confirm Access 97 generates such
> > queries. The query-builder doesn't generate the 'key = NULL' query, but the
> > use of the Forms interface does.
>
> Yes, it was broken as of a couple years ago. What I thought I
> remembered hearing was that the current release (which I guess would
> be Office 2000?) is fixed. The first question is whether that is indeed
> true. The second question, assuming it's true, is how long to continue
> violating the spec and confusing people in order to cater to old broken
> versions of Access. My vote is not too darn long, but others may differ.

</Lurking>

I'm afraid so ... Lots of people (including large institutions) have
Office installed as a "standard" interchange tool, use Office 95 or 97,
but are tired of MS' endless "upgrade" tax and won't "upgrade" to Office
2000, except at gunpoint (i. e. disappearance of volume license
agreements for O95 or O97).

So I'm afraid these versions will have a loooong life ...

<Lurking>

Emmanuel Charpentier

--
Emmanuel Charpentier

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-01-15 07:24:19 RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded.
Previous Message selkovjr 2001-01-15 06:39:01 Re: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!