Re: replication followup

From: Sandeep Joshi <sjoshi(at)Zambeel(dot)com>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Justin Banks <justinb(at)wamnet(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: replication followup
Date: 2001-01-05 20:39:52
Message-ID: 3A563118.7941E432@zambeel.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

How do we get it?
I want to test the product.

Sandeep

> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Justin Banks wrote:
>
> > Hello -
> > As a followup to my mail about replication yesterday, I've
> > realized that I can make replication bi-directional, with each
> > (non-replicant master initiated) connection to a backend it's own
> > master with respect to that connection and all data modifications made
> > within it. In order to do that, though, I need to add items to the
> > structs Port (be) and PGconn (fe). After I do that, the asynch stuff
> > would just fall into place, and the performance should impove. My
> > question is whether there is anything I should be really careful of
> > when modifying these structs? I'm not sure if there is code that uses
> > byte offsets or something into these structs, so any warnings would be
> > much appreciated.
> >
> > On a related note, does anyone know what the status of ER's
> > replication is?
>
> It was comitted to the source tree, under contrib, before Xmas, and will
> be in the beta2 distribution schedualed for this weekend ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas T. Thai 2001-01-05 21:03:11 mysql data to pgsql
Previous Message Alex Pilosov 2001-01-05 20:37:30 SHM ids (was running pgsql 7 under Jail'ed virtual machine on FreeBSD 4.2)