Re: [INTERFACES] Re: PHP and PostgreSQL

From: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To:
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-01-02 13:31:46
Message-ID: 3A51D842.5946D89@mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Does this requested chagne have to do with Apache or PostgreSQL?
>
I suspect it is a request that live postgresql processes can linger
around after a connection is completed and be re-assigned to a new
connection as soon as one comes along. This will save the startup cost
of a new postgresql process. This is what apache does.

--
http://www.mohawksoft.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Myron Scott 2001-01-02 15:43:55 Re: Using Threads?
Previous Message mlw 2001-01-02 13:18:20 Re: Using Threads?

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Carl Shelbourne 2001-01-02 14:11:18 ODBC: how to establish primary key & indexes
Previous Message Markus Hrnvi 2001-01-02 13:06:34 Postgres ODBC driver on Windows 2000?