Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Paul Govereau <pgoverea(at)akamai(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.
Date: 2001-01-02 07:11:52
Message-ID: 3A517F38.8CE020E0@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

> I am strongly inclined to rip out the pseudo-UNDER clause and support
> only the old-style INHERITS syntax for 7.1. UNDER is adding no
> functionality and I think we will eventually regret using an SQL keyword
> for non-SQL semantics.

I agree with you, Hannu, et al. If it isn't making a good effort in
truely supporting SQL9x, then it isn't yet worth having in the parser.

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-01-02 17:48:56 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.
Previous Message Robert B. Easter 2001-01-02 06:59:55 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-02 07:16:53 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Robert B. Easter 2001-01-02 06:59:55 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Inheritance docs error.