Re: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare

From: Frank Joerdens <frank(at)joerdens(dot)de>
To: Jarmo Paavilainen <netletter(at)comder(dot)com>
Cc: MYSQL <mysql(at)lists(dot)mysql(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare
Date: 2000-12-29 12:24:22
Message-ID: 3A4C8276.F478C552@joerdens.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jarmo Paavilainen wrote:
[ . . . ]
> "PostgreSQL*" is postgres whith queries inside transactions. But as long as
> transactions are broken in PostgreSQL you cant use them in real life (if a
> query fails inside a transactions block, PostgreSQL "RollBack"s the whole
> transaction block, and thats broken. You can not convince me of anything
> else).

What do you think _should_ happen when a query fails inside a transaction block? (I am not
trying to convince you of anything, just being curious.)

Regards,

Frank

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gordan Bobic 2000-12-29 12:31:38 Re: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare
Previous Message Jarmo Paavilainen 2000-12-29 12:10:43 MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare