| From: | Karl DeBisschop <karl(at)debisschop(dot)net> | 
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: RPM changes for 7.1. | 
| Date: | 2000-12-13 23:21:24 | 
| Message-ID: | 3A380474.998BE199@debisschop.net | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports | 
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
> Similarly, I find it not useful that PL/Perl and thrown together with
> Pg.pm, and PL/Tcl is thrown together with pgtclsh.  Maybe you want to make
> a separate postgresql-server-{perl,tcl} package.  I think you already
> suggested that.
I agree -- I use DBD, and thus do not feel the need for Pg.pm, but I do use
PL/Perl.
> > However, I am not leaning towards a separate docs subpackage -- it was
> > suggested to me, and I placed it on my list for discussion.
> 
> I don't think this is a bad idea.  Maybe people only want to install the
> docs once in their network and make them available via a web server.  I
> did it that way.
I have created docs packages in the past. Until I was reminded of the
--excludedocs option for rpm. Actually, I may have been one who suggested a
docs package for PostgreSQL)
> > Making the postgresql package depend upon the postgresql-libs package is
> > easy enough.  That means you do have at leats two packages to install.
> 
> (On a quiet night you can hear the Debian users laughing...)
> 
> > One example of a split that seems to work well (AFAIK) is the amanda
> > network backup tool.
> 
> > The main package contains files common to the client and server.
> 
> In PostgreSQL there are, strictly speaking, no files in common to client
> and server.
> 
> Two more points:
> 
> * createlang, droplang, and pg_id should be in the server package.
> 
> * Maybe you want to create a postgresql-server-devel package with the
> backend header files.  These are needed rather seldom.
Would we have postgresql-server-devel and postgresql-clients-devel?
This splits things up rather finely, but it seems consistent, and I 
tend to like that -- overall the way Lamar is going sounds very good 
to me. And supports a point from an old discussion -- no matter how 
good the developers are (and they are great) -- it really helps to 
have a good packager as well.
-- 
Karl DeBisschop                      kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com
Learning Network/Information Please  http://www.infoplease.com
Netsaint Plugin Developer            kdebisschop(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2000-12-13 23:42:46 | Re: Why vacuum? | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-13 23:14:56 | Idea for reducing planning time | 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Korshunov Ilya | 2000-12-14 08:24:07 | |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-12-13 20:05:03 | Re: RPM changes for 7.1. |